Tag: leave to appeal

Peter Sullivan: wrongly gaoled for 38 years by junk science and a complacent justice system

Just before midnight on Friday August 1st 1986 Diane Sindall, a 21 year old florist, ran out of petrol on a Birkenhead roundabout. She got out of her car and went to look for a 24 hour petrol station. She was no more than 500 yards from her car when she was struck on the head with a blunt instrument, dragged into an alleyway, stripped half-naked and sexually assaulted.

The following afternoon, Saturday August 2nd 1986, her battered and grossly mutilated body was found. The cause of death was a cerebral haemorrhage following multiple blows to the head. The mutilations included apparent bite marks to her breasts. The crime was obviously sexually motivated, and samples of semen, heavily diluted with rainwater, were taken from the outside of her body.

It was a particularly horrific murder and it caused fear and outrage well beyond Merseyside. Only 5 years earlier Peter Sutcliffe – The Yorkshire Ripper – had been convicted of the serial murders of thirteen women, all of whom had been mutilated after being attacked with blunt instruments. Continue reading “Peter Sullivan: wrongly gaoled for 38 years by junk science and a complacent justice system”

The Post Office “exonerations” Bill must also quash the convictions of unsuccessful appellants

Last week the government published the Post Office (Horizon System) Offences Bill. It receives its second reading in the House of Commons today.

Clause 1 (1) provides:

“Every conviction to which this Act applies is quashed on the coming into force of this Act.”

The Bill will quash the convictions of all Sub-Postmasters and Postmistresses (“SPMs”) who were prosecuted by either the Post Office or the Crown Prosecution Service, whether they pleaded guilty, or were found guilty of a “relevant offence” (that is theft, fraud, false accounting or similar offences of dishonesty) against the Post Office between September 1996 and December 31 2018. Any who were instead formally cautioned will have their cautions expunged.

There will be no need for any of them to show that Horizon evidence was essential, or even relevant, to their convictions as long as they were working in a Post Office where Horizon was in use, and that the offences were allegedly committed while they were working “in connection with” or “for the purpose of” Post Office business. So long as these minimal conditions are fulfilled their convictions will be quashed.

The Bill does not apply where the prosecution was undertaken by an agency other than the Post Office or the CPS. This seems odd and unfair, because some prosecutions were carried out by the Department for Work and Pensions. Just as the CPS used Horizon and Post Office evidence, so did the Department for Work and Pensions; and it did not miraculously become reliable just because it was being used by the DWP.

Nevertheless, for the most part it is a good and necessary Bill. No doubt some guilty people will be cleared along with the innocent. Post Office employees convicted of stealing from the mail, or stealing from a till on the basis of CCTV evidence, could find themselves declared innocent even if their convictions had nothing to do with Horizon. So be it. Some wrongful acquittals are a small price to pay to help to rectify the most widespread miscarriage of justice scandal of modern times. Continue reading “The Post Office “exonerations” Bill must also quash the convictions of unsuccessful appellants”